close
close

A balancing act? – Brand Wagon News

A balancing act? – Brand Wagon News

In a temporary relief for advertisers, Google has dropped its plan to ban third-party cookies from Chrome, despite mounting privacy concerns from governments, consumer rights groups and industry watchdogs. The decision, revealed in an updated blog post four years after it was first announced, introduces a “new experience in Chrome” to help users make informed choices about their browsing preferences that can be updated at any time.

Google, whose advertising revenue rose to $237.8 billion in 2023, has promoted this new approach as a “balanced solution” for its large user base. Chrome, which commands about 65% of the global internet browser marketremains an important platform for digital advertisers lobbying for the retention of third-party cookies.

short article insert The continuation of third-party cookies addresses immediate concerns about disruption to online advertising and commerce, and for most consumers it means their internet experience will remain largely unchanged. Abhishek Tiwari, head of global business at mobile advertising company NetSetGo Media, said: “The decision to retain third-party cookies means that businesses that rely heavily on targeted advertising can continue unabated – they can continue with their ongoing marketing strategies without immediate and drastic changes.” For customers who prioritize privacy, this is “a clear win,” says Tiwari, because they can disable site-based tracking entirely. Those who don’t actively opt out will continue to encounter third-party cookies and enjoy personalized experiences as a result.

According to Shradha Agarwal, co-founder and CEO of communications agency Grapes, this will also work in Google’s favor as competition intensifies, helping Google build a more loyal audience and provide them with better experiences.

So everything is fine?

Not really, according to experts. Ambika Sharma, founder and chief strategist at Pulp Strategy, says there’s a good side to this move, as well as a bad side. It gives users more control. They can make informed choices about third-party cookies, similar to the opt-in model Apple uses for app tracking. This can increase transparency and give users more autonomy over their data. On the other hand, the complexity of managing these settings can lead to confusion and mistrust in the effectiveness of these controls.

Others are a bit more hard-line in their stance. This decision could present new challenges, especially for companies that have already invested in cookieless tracking solutions. Amit Relan, co-founder and CEO of mFilterIt, points out that many of the company’s customers had already explored new possibilities with a cookieless future in mind. “Some of our large customers in the FMCG and the BFSI domain moved towards relevance and contextual targeting for ad placements to reach the relevant audience with a three-fold increase in efficiency,” he says.

Experts also say the move will lead to further fragmentation of the advertising industry. Rahil Khan, CMO & Director of Sellergize, says that Google’s decision to abandon the deprecation of third-party cookies in Chrome raises significant ethical concerns for affiliate publishers. While Chrome can continue to use third-party cookies, browsers like Firefox and Safari have already embraced a more privacy-focused approach by banning them altogether. “This fragmentation creates challenges for advertisers who rely on cookie-based tracking methods,” he adds.

But that’s the least of advertisers’ worries. The added complexity of user consent on Chrome complicates matters, requiring companies to adjust their strategies based on varying levels of user consent. This shift will also require more robust privacy practices and clearer communication with users about data usage, potentially increasing operational costs.

Yasin Hamidani, managing director of Media Care Brand Solutions, says balancing user control and privacy with advertisers’ data needs can be more complex than it first appears. “Users can become confused or fatigued by having to manage cookie preferences across sites, leading to inconsistent privacy protections,” he says. He adds that this approach may not fully address concerns about data security and misuse, leaving room for skepticism among privacy advocates.

Of course, Google has said it remains committed to developing the Privacy Sandbox, an alternative ad tech solution designed to improve user privacy while preserving the functionality of digital ads. Early tests have shown promise, but experts have highlighted challenges to the effectiveness of remarketing.

According to experts, advertisers should no longer rely on cookies, which have long been criticized for their intrusiveness and inefficiency, but should instead look to leverage first-party data while also working together to obtain better partner data.

follow us on TwitterInstagram, LinkedIn, Facebook